Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

Chandigarh's Le Corbusier : the struggle for modernity in postcolonial India / Vikramaditya Prakash.

By: Prakash, VikramadityaSeries: Studies in modernity and national identityPublisher: Seattle : University of Washington Press, c2002Description: vii, 178 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 26 cm001: BDZ0005107625ISBN: 9780295982076 (alk. paper)Subject(s): Le Corbusier, 1887-1965 | Architecture -- History -- 20th century. -- India -- Chandigarh | City planning -- History -- 20th century. -- India -- Chandigarh | Architecture and Planning | Architecture | Architecture: public buildings | India | Individual architects & architectural firms | Architectural structure & design | History of architecture | Architecture: professional practice | Chandigarh (India) -- Social conditionsDDC classification: 720.954552 LOC classification: NA1508.C44 | P73 2002
Contents:
Acknowledgments -- Introduction: The "East-West" Opposition in Chandigarh's Le Corbusier -- The Master Plan: Contesting Conceptions of the Modern -- The Capitol Complex: The Rousseauesque Garden of Eden -- With Open Hands: Architectural Symbolism and the Vagaries of Political Claims -- Afterword: Notes on Inheriting a Postcolonial Modernism -- Notes -- Chronology -- Bibliography -- Index -- Illustration Credits
Summary: Describes the creation of the new capital of Punjab in 1947. When India emerged from colonial rule in 1947, the division of Punjab left its historic capital, Lahore, in newly created Pakistan. Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru insisted that Punjab's new capital, Chandigarh, should be a symbol of the nation's faith in the future, unfettered by the traditions of the past. Its design and construction galvanized national attention, and Le Corbusier, the icon of European architectural modernism, was invited to help remake India's national ideal.Le Corbusier arrived in 1950, in the twilight of his career. He set to work alternately wooing and clashing with Nehru and with the Indian planners and builders, prevailing ultimately only in the design of the Capitol Complex and a few buildings in the Museum Complex, as well as in his enduring symbol of peace and nonalignment, the Open Hand.Vikramaditya Prakash tells the fascinating story that lies behind the planning and architecture of Chandigarh. Drawing on his intimate knowledge of the city, where he grew up as the son of one of the nine Indian architects who assisted in designing Chandigarh, Prakash brings to light stories of town planners, bureaucrats, and architects vying over the colonial past and the symbolic future of India. Different conceptions of the modern and the role of Indian civilization clashed and coalesced in a process that highlights the mutual interdependence of "East" and "West," and the fact that architecture and aesthetics cannot be separated from ideological claims and political implications.Prakash skillfully unfolds the intricate layers of the Capitol's symbolism, tracing the cultural preconceptions and influences that produced Le Corbusier's understanding of India and animated his obsessions, desires, and aspirations. Chandigarh's Le Corbusier is the story of the making of an Indian modern architecture as both an aspect and an engine of post-colonial culture.
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Book MAIN LIBRARY Book PRINT 720.954 PRA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 114620

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

When India emerged from colonial rule in 1947, the division of Punjab left its historic capital, Lahore, in newly created Pakistan. Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru insisted that Punjab's new capital, Chandigarh, should be a symbol of the nation's faith in the future, unfettered by the traditions of the past. Its design and construction galvanized national attention, and Le Corbusier, the icon of European architectural modernism, was invited to help remake India's national ideal.

Le Corbusier arrived in 1950, in the twilight of his career. He set to work alternately wooing and clashing with Nehru and with the Indian planners and builders, prevailing ultimately only in the design of the Capitol Complex and a few buildings in the Museum Complex, as well as in his enduring symbol of peace and nonalignment, the Open Hand.

Vikramaditya Prakash tells the fascinating story that lies behind the planning and architecture of Chandigarh. Drawing on his intimate knowledge of the city, where he grew up as the son of one of the nine Indian architects who assisted in designing Chandigarh, Prakash brings to light stories of town planners, bureaucrats, and architects vying over the colonial past and the symbolic future of India. Different conceptions of the modern and the role of Indian civilization clashed and coalesced in a process that highlights the mutual interdependence of "East" and "West," and the fact that architecture and aesthetics cannot be separated from ideological claims and political implications.

Prakash skillfully unfolds the intricate layers of the Capitol's symbolism, tracing the cultural preconceptions and influences that produced Le Corbusier's understanding of India and animated his obsessions, desires, and aspirations. Chandigarh's Le Corbusier is the story of the making of an Indian modern architecture as both an aspect and an engine of post-colonial culture.

Acknowledgments -- Introduction: The "East-West" Opposition in Chandigarh's Le Corbusier -- The Master Plan: Contesting Conceptions of the Modern -- The Capitol Complex: The Rousseauesque Garden of Eden -- With Open Hands: Architectural Symbolism and the Vagaries of Political Claims -- Afterword: Notes on Inheriting a Postcolonial Modernism -- Notes -- Chronology -- Bibliography -- Index -- Illustration Credits

Describes the creation of the new capital of Punjab in 1947. When India emerged from colonial rule in 1947, the division of Punjab left its historic capital, Lahore, in newly created Pakistan. Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru insisted that Punjab's new capital, Chandigarh, should be a symbol of the nation's faith in the future, unfettered by the traditions of the past. Its design and construction galvanized national attention, and Le Corbusier, the icon of European architectural modernism, was invited to help remake India's national ideal.Le Corbusier arrived in 1950, in the twilight of his career. He set to work alternately wooing and clashing with Nehru and with the Indian planners and builders, prevailing ultimately only in the design of the Capitol Complex and a few buildings in the Museum Complex, as well as in his enduring symbol of peace and nonalignment, the Open Hand.Vikramaditya Prakash tells the fascinating story that lies behind the planning and architecture of Chandigarh. Drawing on his intimate knowledge of the city, where he grew up as the son of one of the nine Indian architects who assisted in designing Chandigarh, Prakash brings to light stories of town planners, bureaucrats, and architects vying over the colonial past and the symbolic future of India. Different conceptions of the modern and the role of Indian civilization clashed and coalesced in a process that highlights the mutual interdependence of "East" and "West," and the fact that architecture and aesthetics cannot be separated from ideological claims and political implications.Prakash skillfully unfolds the intricate layers of the Capitol's symbolism, tracing the cultural preconceptions and influences that produced Le Corbusier's understanding of India and animated his obsessions, desires, and aspirations. Chandigarh's Le Corbusier is the story of the making of an Indian modern architecture as both an aspect and an engine of post-colonial culture.

Table of contents provided by Syndetics

  • Acknowledgments (p. vii)
  • 1 Introduction: The "East-West" Opposition in Chandigarh's Le Corbusier (p. 3)
  • 2 The Master Plan: Contesting Conceptions of the Modern (p. 31)
  • 3 The Capitol Complex: The Rousseauesque Garden of Eden (p. 71)
  • 4 The Capitol Buildings: The Aesthetics of the High Court and the Assembly (p. 96)
  • 5 With Open Hands: Architectural Symbolism and the Vagaries of Political Claims (p. 123)
  • 6 Afterword: Notes on Inheriting a Postcolonial Modernism (p. 146)
  • Notes (p. 156)
  • Chronology (p. 168)
  • Bibliography (p. 169)
  • Index (p. 173)
  • Illustration Credits (p. 178)

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha